← Previous
Carlfish: SMH article summary of the day: “Chatroulette, the infamous voyeuristic video chat site, is investigating ways of blocking out male genitals as the website battles a sharp decline in visitor numbers.” jirra: They don't get female genitals on there? Or they're not a problem? jedi: They're probably more of a solution than a problem. Swoon: Or maybe genital-recognition software is more advanced for men. Carlfish: The tech industry is often accused of being phallocentric. jedi: In order to detect them, just convert the video stream to ascii and check for any occurrences of 8===D Carlfish: But what if you _are_ a smiling giraffe? jirra: If so, what are you smiling about? Are your genitals covered? Carlfish: Levi's Law. On the Internet, any conversation will eventually return to the subject of pants. jirra: They just need a sign on the login screen - ARE YOU WEARING PANTS? Carlfish: ARE YOU PLANNING ON CONTINUING TO WEAR PANTS? Carlfish: REALLY? Carlfish: THEN WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING ON THIS SITE?
Next →
Generally, if people justify the use of ‘plz’ because it’s shorter than 'please’, I quite happily justify 'no’ because it’s shorter than 'yes’. <em>WobWork</em>